Friday, 26 March 2010

Land off High Road

I received an email from a resident earlier in the week asking about development in the High Road area. Can I stress that I have no knowledge of any application having been submitted nor knowledge to suggest that one will shortly be so. I have used some photo-editing software to make a mock-up of the impact such a development could have to the northern end of the village.

Area as it currently looks on Google Earth


As area would look with development adjacent to the Queens Head

I wonder how residents in this area would feel about such a development. Personally, as a resident of Burgh Castle, I would feel that this could lead to erosion of the rural character of the area. Of course, as I mentioned, I have no idea of when, or even if, anyone might try and develop this piece of land.

On another note about development, I did speak with the Chairman of the Parish Council last night and he tells me that no one has written into the council to share their considerations about the future of the village. Given the large public interest last meeting I would have expected at least 10 responses. Hopefully some will be forthcoming before the next meeting on the 8th of April 2010.

Thursday, 18 March 2010

My Idea for the Church Triangle

At the last Parish Council meeting the Chairman, Cllr Greenacre, asked members of the public gallery for their thoughts on the Church Triangle.

The screen shot below from Google Earth shows the location of the Triangle outside of the church gates.



Currently, the Triangle features a litter bin, road sign and is generally unkept as the photo below shows clearly.



I spent some time with an image editing piece of software and came up with the design below:


You can see that I have restored the Triangle to somewhere approaching its original size and I have relocated the St. Fursey's Celtic Cross from the Churchyard to a more prominent position. I did this to give the Triangle a purpose other than that of roundabout. The cross I relocated to allow people to appreciate the important role that St. Fursey played within the village.

I have asked for this item to be placed on the next Parish Council agenda which is scheduled to be heard at the meeting on Monday 12th April, 7:30pm, in the Village Hall.



Tuesday, 9 March 2010

Strategic Parking

Had this idea for a while and wondered if anyone else had thought about it.

One of the arguments that I have against double yellow lines is that they actually speed up the flow of traffic. In a village where speed is already an issue, the addition of double yellow lines could be counter productive.

If we all parked strategically, as shown in the diagram below, I wonder if we could not have a positive impact in reducing the speed of traffic along our roads.

Thompson's Strategic Parking Idea

The red car is travelling down the road. The green, blue and yellow car have been parked in such a way as to create a slalom. The effect is that the red car has to slow down to negotiate this obstacle.

Unlike a road hump, or sleeping policeman, this traffic calming measure can be moved to where it is needed most. 

I would suggest that this is something that could be instantly implemented with maximum impact. Another agenda item??

Idea to cut speeding?

We in Burgh Castle have long complained about the speed at which some drivers roar along our low quality roads. I have posted on this issue before and continue to witness people driving at dangerous speeds daily.

It seems that on solution could be in the planting of trees. I found this article on the BBC News website and I post it here for us to consider.


More than 160 trees are being planted on rural roads in Norfolk in an "experiment" to stop drivers speeding.
It is hoped trees in Martham, Mundesley, Overstrand and Horstead will create an "avenue effect" and encourage drivers to slow down.
Very few trees line the 30mph approach roads, which are straight and wide. All four villages had a history of speeding problems, Norfolk County Council said.
Oak, field maple, birch and hornbeam will be planted in the £70,000 trial.
All 163 trees, and 1,443ft (440m) of hedges in Martham, are expected to be planted by the end of March.
Adrian Gunson, cabinet member for planning and transportation, described the trial as an "innovative, environmentally-friendly experiment".
"The idea is to use the trees and hedges to create an avenue effect to try and limit drivers' peripheral vision and make them slow down accordingly as they enter the respective villages," he added.

I wonder if this is worth a place on next month's agenda??

Tell Thompson

The Church Triangle

At the Parish Council Meeting last night, Parish Council Chairman Trevor Greenacre invited members of the public to suggest ideas for the Church Triangle.

This piece of land, shown in the screenshot from Google Earth below, has been disputed in terms of ownership for many years. It was announced last night that the triangle is in fact Glebe Land and belongs to the Church.

The Church Triangle


Maureen Grey suggested that the Parish Council write to the local rector and ask his permission to start its rejuvenation. Previously the site had been home to Elm trees and was roughly four times its existing size. With the new car park being built at the new castle visitors centre, the area of the Triangle should be used less and less for parking.

Resident Survey - for new visitors

I have decided that in the wake of last night's meeting I should re-publish my "Local Residents Survey". Please do complete the form to let me know what concerns you.

Strategic Vision for Burgh Castle: update

At the Parish Council meeting last evening we had a packed public gallery in response to the Strategic Vision agenda item. I was particularly pleased to see so many people at the meeting as month after month we are only joined by as many as 4 members of the public.

Despite the attendance of such a relatively high number of people, we only heard the views from a couple. It was for this reason that I asked the Chairman to keep the item on the agenda for next month. I hope that those people who did not feel comfortable speaking last night will now take the opportunity to put pen to paper.

Last month Cllr Russell asked for fellow councillors to respond to the documents that he circulated. I have to be honest that I was a little disappointed that I and Cllr Roberts were the only ones who did so. Such an important issue should invoke serious debate and we unfortunately did not have much of that last night. I am sure however that we will all take stock and have plenty to say on the matter next month.

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Holiday Camp Proliferation Zone

Just to clarify the point that I was making yesterday; the screen shot below shows that band of holiday camp development that stretches from the River Waveney in the west to the Lords Lane village boundary in the east.

click to enlarge

Once again, I will be remarking on these observations at the Parish Council meeting on Monday, 8th February, as part of the Strategic Vision discussion.

Monday, 1 March 2010

Agenda for 8th March 2010

BURGH CASTLE PARISH COUNCIL
Chairman  Trevor Greenacre Greenacre, Stepshort, Burgh Castle, NR31 9PT Tel:- 01493 780126 
You are hereby summoned to attend a meeting of Burgh Castle Parish Council at the Village Hall, Church Road on Monday 8thMarch 2010 at 7.30 pm
Brenda Hoskins Clerk to the Parish Council    24th February 2010
 
Agenda 
Public Participation - Members of the public may raise points for consideration by Councillors. This part of the evening will also include County Council, Borough Council and Police reports. 
1-3  To consider apologies for absence
2-3  To record Declarations of Interest
3-3 To approve the Minutes of previous council meeting
4-3   Matters Arising for information only.
5-3   To consider planning applications.
6-3 To discuss the Strategic Plan for the Village.
    7-3 To approve payments made as on attached list.  Receive monthly T.B.
8-3  To receive the following items for information (list attached).
9-3 To receive items for the next agenda
10-3 Time & date of next meeting.  12th April 2010 at 7.30pm.

Brenda Hoskins
Clerk for
Burgh Castle Parish Council

Strategic Vision for Burgh Castle - a response.

At the meeting of the Parish Council on the 8th February 2010, Cllr Russell outlined the council's plans to consult with members of the public about the future direction that the village will adopt. At that meeting he circulated some documents which showed areas of potential development.

I publish this post in response to those document as a resident of Butt Lane, Burgh Castle and not as a Borough Councillor nor as a representative of any authority.

My initial reaction to the documents that were circulated was that we are a village that cannot tolerate any more development given the state of our infrastructure and the already highly populated holiday parks. It should be noted that some of these park residents stay on site some 11 months of the year.

This screenshot from Google Earth shows the true picture.

From the River Waveney on the left of the image, holiday camps extend virtually all the way across the village to its boundary on Lord's Lane.

The shape of the village is something of a distended pentagram if one looks at the shape given by Butt Lane, High Road and Mill Road. The temptation maybe to suggest that the land inside this pentagram should be prone to large scale, infilling, development. I would argue that such a move would destroy the rural heart of Burgh Castle and must be resisted at all costs.

Land adjacent to the River Waveney is protected from development due to the vicinity of the Roman Fort. Whilst it is unlikely to happen, any planned development in the land between Butt Lane and the Gariannonum must also be resisted with similar motive.

There has been talk previously about a development in the area known as "The Doles" behind Butt Lane. I have taken a screenshot from Google Maps and shaded the area and included positioning of possible access roads to the site based on current access. 




This proposal raises several questions, not least for the developer. The water table here is very high and the proximity of the Fen dyke makes flooding a real possibility. Secondly, the amount of piling required would place a real burden on the current infrastructure. 

A development here would not adversely affect the rural character of the northern end of the village which is home to the only operational farm in that area. However, the size of the site would guarantee that this would present a massive alteration to the southern end of the village. One thing is certain, without significant improvements to the existing infrastructure, especially drainage, this development could not enjoy my support. 

Land off High Road was also identified in the discussion documents. In my opinion, High Road is too narrow and of too poor a quality to facilitate any development of large scale in this area. I have highlighted the area of interest below.





Change in my view is inevitable and managed change is the only sure way that people who live in a village can be assured of as little impact as possible.

Whilst I have identified issues with several of the sites identified at the last Parish Council Meeting, I do feel that some of the areas of interest could be conducive to very small scale development. In particular I draw attention to the areas highlighted below.




Once again, I must reiterate that these possible sites would only be supported by me as potential sites of development if the proposed development was in keeping with the rural nature of the village. 

I look forward to the next meeting of the Council which takes place on 8th March at 7:30pm in the Village Hall.